News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Solarium ban not fair 

Solarium ban not fair

10 Feb, 2012 03:00 AM
A BATHURST hairdresser has spoken out against a ban on solariums and tanning beds, coming into effect in 2014.

The state government ban is in response to research that links solarium use with a range of skin cancers.

But Lucinderellas Instyle Hair and Beauty owner Lucinda Hyder has criticised the ban, saying people should have the right to use tanning beds if they wish.

“I think there are a lot more pressing concerns for the upper house to look at, including child welfare, health care and education,” she said.

“People deserve a choice and if they want to use a solarium, then they should be able to. People can readily buy alcohol and cigarettes; it’s all about choice.

“If they ban solariums, they should look at banning cars, because they cause deaths every day.”

The new laws will ban comm-ercial ultraviolet (UV) solarium tanning units in NSW from 2014.

Environment Minister Robyn Parker said solarium use was associated with a range of skin cancers, including melanoma, which is the most life threatening form of skin cancer and the most common form of skin cancer among 15 to 39-year-olds.

“The International Agency for Research on Cancer has increased the classification for solaria to ‘carcinogenic to humans’ and this places solaria in the same category of risk of harm to humans as asbestos,” she said.

“Sadly, Australia has the highest incidence of skin cancer in the world and this ban is long overdue.”

Ms Hyder defended her industry’s use of tanning beds, saying Lucinderellas does not advertise their solarium and follows a strict procedure.

“People must be over 18 to use it and we go through a formal skin check. We let them know what type their skin is and how many minutes they should stay in for,” she said.

“People with fair skin or red heads cannot use them.

“There are warnings in the solarium and people can’t stay in there for hours.

“There are positives to solariums, but the media only talk about the negatives. For people with skin problems like eczema, a solarium can clear it up, and for some people who work in offices, it is their only chance to get some vitamin D.

“Everything in moderation and we offer sunscreen for people to put on their lips or moles if they like.”

Ms Hyder said solariums are not all that popular.

“Spray tans are more popular, but it is all about choice.”

But Ms Parker said that recent advice indicated that the level of skin cancer risk associated with solarium use is higher than previously understood.

“Obviously we can’t stop people going out in the sun but this ban will prevent them from being exposed to the harmful UV from tanning units,” she said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The ban is certainly not fair - on the customers who know no better.

It should have commenced in 2012 - or earlier.

I spend my time outside hiding under a hat, long sleaves and gloves.

I feel sorry for workers who can not escape ultraviolet impact

Posted by Sonny, 10/02/2012 7:49:53 AM, on Western Advocate
Exposure to ultraviolet radiation through the use of sunbeds, or solariums, significantly increases the risk of developing melanoma.Over 2000 people die from skin cancer in Australia each year.Australia also has the highest incidence of skin cancer in the world. Skin cancer account for 80% of newly diagnosed cancer in Australia and it is one of only a few cancers that are preventable.
Posted by Janice, 10/02/2012 8:26:01 AM, on Western Advocate
There are many pressing issues and cancer is a huge one!! Ban the solariums ASAP! They are a known cause of melenoma the same as the sun is! We are told to cover up in the sun and yet those that use solariums are not covered at all! This is ridiculous!! Cancer is a huge cost on our society and any prevention is essential!!
Posted by Causing cancer, 10/02/2012 8:34:29 AM, on Western Advocate
Lucinda,

You are absolutely correct to say banning solariums is unfair. It is also unfair to expect the health system to pay for the cancer treatment of those who use these things.

It is highly hypocritical that smoking is not banned too due to its cancer causing, but smokers pay for their treatment many times over through the tax on tobacco.

And yes cars do kill in the hands of the poorly skilled and irresponsible but the do have a valuable and essential purpose in society. Tanned skin does not.

Julia Doulman

PS I'm not a smoker.

Posted by Julia Doulman, 10/02/2012 8:34:35 AM, on Western Advocate
Ms Hyder should realise that using a UV solarium is no better for skin than tanning in the open sunshine. I have a close friend who has been given 12 months to live due to melanoma and associated skin cancers. Any "beauty" procedure that carries that sort of risk is unacceptable and should be banned.

As for health benefits ... if they exist as Ms Hyder claims perhaps they would be better performed by health professionals.

Posted by Anya, 10/02/2012 8:48:16 AM, on Western Advocate
Tanning is skin cells in Trauma. I think that the government has made a wonderful move on banning solariums, as skin cancer kills. I use to use this solarium until I went for a skin check and had four moles removed. I was never given a skin consultation or told how long to stay in there for, my skin is quite fair and now I have damaged it. I regret using solariums and the damage I did to my skin.
Posted by Kate, 10/02/2012 8:49:14 AM, on Western Advocate
I am a beautician in Bathurst. Banning solariums is something I fully support. Over the 20+ years I have been in the industry I have seen alot of terribly damaged skin from the use of solariums and excessive sun exposure. Tanning causes early aging, wrinkles, rough dry skin, redness, uneven skin tone, age spots etc. I have had clients that have spent hundreds and hundreds of dollars trying to fix their skin but unfortunately once the damage is done it is hard to repair. Vitamin D is important to our skin but expose to UV rays is not at all necessary or recommended .
Posted by Beautician, 10/02/2012 9:06:05 AM, on Western Advocate
Cars used according to the law do no harm - these beds cause harm no matter how they are used.
Posted by george peterson, 10/02/2012 9:54:35 AM, on Western Advocate
If this is legal and fair based on the science, why on EARTH are we still allowed to sell, buy and smoke cigarettes?
Posted by Matthew, 10/02/2012 10:41:38 AM, on Western Advocate
If some idiots want to go lay under uv rays knowing all the risks associated then let them. I agree with them being banned whole heartedly, melanoma is one of Australia's biggest killers. Why wait till 2014 though, why not now??? It's like telling a smoker not to smoke...sometimes you will just never get through...
Posted by Idiots, 10/02/2012 11:21:00 AM, on Western Advocate
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
PEOPLE’S CHOICE: Lucinda Hyder from Lucinderellas Instyle Hair and Beauty believes people should be able to choose if they want to use a solarium or not. Photo: CHRIS SEABROOK	 020812c1
PEOPLE’S CHOICE: Lucinda Hyder from Lucinderellas Instyle Hair and Beauty believes people should be able to choose if they want to use a solarium or not. Photo: CHRIS SEABROOK 020812c1

Most popular articles




Western Advocate







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...