A number of South Bathurst residents rallied together at Bant Street on Tuesday morning to campaign against the removal of five 100-year-old oak trees, calling for greater public consultation and protection regarding the management of the trees.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
$1/
(min cost $8)
Login or signup to continue reading
However, the five trees, situated between 56 and 58 Bant Street, lie just outside the Bathurst/ West Bathurst Heritage Conservation Area where Bathurst Regional Council has a tree preservation order in place.
Work was paused on the site early Tuesday morning after South Bathurst resident Cathie Hale raised the issue with workers taking action on the trees.
"I talked to the tree lopper, and even he thought it was madness that such trees were being cut down," Ms Hale said.
"While the trees are on private property and the site lies just outside the Heritage Conservation Area, these trees are important on so many levels, from animal habitat to environmental cooling.
"It's about time council's outdated tree preservation order was updated to include all sorts of trees, wherever they are; not many trees get to 100 years old anymore with the way the climate is."
![METRES AWAY: Bathurst councillor Margaret Hogan [inset] said the location of the Bant Street oaks [blue dot] lies outside council's Heritage Conservation Area [red zone, where tree preservation policies are in place] on private land.](/images/transform/v1/crop/frm/xry9xtRQu9u36zRV2j5976/26df484a-860a-41b7-9bb8-f2a84d149694.png/r0_0_1367_848_w576_h298_fmax.jpg "METRES AWAY: Bathurst councillor Margaret Hogan [inset] said the location of the Bant Street oaks [blue dot] lies outside council's Heritage Conservation Area [red zone, where tree preservation policies are in place] on private land.")
Bathurst councillor Margaret Hogan said she was distressed to see mature oaks being cut down along Bant Street, but stressed the owner of the property wasn't in breach of council policy.
"This is privately owned land and isn't in the Heritage Conservation Area highlighted by council, therefore there is no tree preservation order required and the property owner is legally within their rights to do this," Cr Hogan said.
"According to the advice I received from council, no planning approval or engineering approval was required for the site, but we'd be having a very different conversation if the trees were on council-owned land or within a Heritage Conservation Area."
Cr Hogan said she has called on fellow councillors to support a working party to revisit the Heritage Tree Preservation and Management Policy, which was last revised in 2013.
"The world has changed in the last 10 years, and so have attitudes towards wildlife preservation, so I feel this is something that deserves another look over," she said.
South Bathurst resident and keen bird photographer Tim Bergen, who was among concerned locals on Tuesday morning, said the Bant Street oaks are prime habitat for a number of species.
"Most afternoons I see yellow-tailed black cockatoos flying here, and king parrots, bats and various other birds use these trees for shelter; they're part of our environment, and you just can't chop 100-year-old trees down," Mr Bergen said.
Our journalists work hard to provide local, up-to-date news to the community. This is how you can access our trusted content:
- Bookmark www.westernadvocate.com.au
- Make sure you are signed up for our breaking and regular headlines newsletters
- Follow us on Twitter
- Follow us on Instagram
- Follow us on Google News
Sam Bolt
"I'm not in the business of telling people what to do. I'm much more in the business of describing things, situations and stuff like that and leaving them out there, and you can make up your minds about them." -Nick Cave
"I'm not in the business of telling people what to do. I'm much more in the business of describing things, situations and stuff like that and leaving them out there, and you can make up your minds about them." -Nick Cave
